Venable v. City of Atlanta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Venable v. City of Atlanta

70 S.E. 28, 8 Ga. App. 575, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 59

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 24, 1911

Docket2697

StatusPublished

This text of 70 S.E. 28 (Venable v. City of Atlanta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Venable v. City of Atlanta, 70 S.E. 28, 8 Ga. App. 575, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 59 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

JRussell, J.

Though the conduct of the prosecutor and his occupation of detective were such as to throw doubt upon his statements, nevertheless his testimony was competent, and sufficient to authorize the defendant’s conviction in the recorder’s-court; and as the only assignment o'f error insisted upon here is that the evidence was not sufficient to authorize the conviction, an affirmance of the judgment overruling the certiorari necessarily results. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JRussell, J.

Though the conduct of the prosecutor and his occupation of detective were such as to throw doubt upon his statements, nevertheless his testimony was competent, and sufficient to authorize the defendant’s conviction in the recorder’s-court; and as the only assignment o'f error insisted upon here is that the evidence was not sufficient to authorize the conviction, an affirmance of the judgment overruling the certiorari necessarily results. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 S.E. 28, 8 Ga. App. 575, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/venable-v-city-of-atlanta-gactapp-1911.