Venable v. City of Atlanta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Venable v. City of Atlanta

70 S.E. 28, 8 Ga. App. 575, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 59

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Venable v. City of Atlanta. Read the opinion of the Court — 7 Ga. App. 190 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 24, 1911·No. 2697·Published

Opinion

JRussell, J.

Though the conduct of the prosecutor and his occupation of detective were such as to throw doubt upon his statements, nevertheless his testimony was competent, and sufficient to authorize the defendant’s conviction in the recorder’s-court; and as the only assignment o'f error insisted upon here is that the evidence was not sufficient to authorize the conviction, an affirmance of the judgment overruling the certiorari necessarily results. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JRussell, J.

Though the conduct of the prosecutor and his occupation of detective were such as to throw doubt upon his statements, nevertheless his testimony was competent, and sufficient to authorize the defendant’s conviction in the recorder’s-court; and as the only assignment o'f error insisted upon here is that the evidence was not sufficient to authorize the conviction, an affirmance of the judgment overruling the certiorari necessarily results. Judgment affirmed.

Venable v. City of Atlanta, 70 S.E. 28, 8 Ga. App. 575, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 59 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

70 S.E. 28 (Venable v. City of Atlanta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.