Venable v. Budd

Supreme Court of Kansas

Venable v. Budd

89 P. 901, 75 Kan. 860, 1907 Kan. LEXIS 170

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedApril 6, 1907

DocketNo. 14,977

StatusPublished

This text of 89 P. 901 (Venable v. Budd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Venable v. Budd, 89 P. 901, 75 Kan. 860, 1907 Kan. LEXIS 170 (kan 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Plaintiff asks for a review of trial errors without presenting either a case-made or a bill of exceptions. He brings a transcript of the record, and puts into it what is claimed to be a transcript of the evidence, with exceptions, and the rulings of the court. There is no certificate of the stenographer that the transcript of his notes attached to the record is true and correct, and not being authenticated as the statute requires it cannot be considered. (Laws 1905, ch. 320, § 1.) There being nothing before us for review, the proceeding is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Plaintiff asks for a review of trial errors without presenting either a case-made or a bill of exceptions. He brings a transcript of the record, and puts into it what is claimed to be a transcript of the evidence, with exceptions, and the rulings of the court. There is no certificate of the stenographer that the transcript of his notes attached to the record is true and correct, and not being authenticated as the statute requires it cannot be considered. (Laws 1905, ch. 320, § 1.) There being nothing before us for review, the proceeding is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 P. 901, 75 Kan. 860, 1907 Kan. LEXIS 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/venable-v-budd-kan-1907.