Venable v. Blum

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Venable v. Blum

77 N.J.L. 451, 48 Vroom 451

DecidedFebruary 23, 1909

StatusPublished

This text of 77 N.J.L. 451 (Venable v. Blum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Venable v. Blum, 77 N.J.L. 451, 48 Vroom 451 (N.J. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Per CuRiam.

An examination of the record fails to disclose any finding of facts in the state of the case as agreed upon by the parties. The state of the case should contain the facts so found from the testimony and not the testimony. Van Vechten v. McGuire, 41 Vroom 657.

There is no record of judgment, but merely a statement that a judgment favorable to the defendant was entered. There is one specification involving controverted facts which fails to point out any ruling or determination by the court below in matter of law.

The appeal will therefore be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per CuRiam.

An examination of the record fails to disclose any finding of facts in the state of the case as agreed upon by the parties. The state of the case should contain the facts so found from the testimony and not the testimony. Van Vechten v. McGuire, 41 Vroom 657.

There is no record of judgment, but merely a statement that a judgment favorable to the defendant was entered. There is one specification involving controverted facts which fails to point out any ruling or determination by the court below in matter of law.

The appeal will therefore be dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 N.J.L. 451, 48 Vroom 451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/venable-v-blum-nj-1909.