Velez v. Springer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Velez v. Springer

92 A.D.2d 610, 460 N.Y.S.2d 61, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16873

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 28, 1983·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—■ In a medical malpractice and wrongful death action, defendant Springer appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Composta, J.), dated June 29, 1982, which, after a traverse hearing, denied his motion to dismiss the complaint as to him for lack of personal jurisdiction. Order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs. The deputy sheriff’s attempt to personally serve defendant Springer on three separate occasions at Springer’s combined home and office, at least one of which was during his office hours, constituted due diligence in attempting personal service as required under CPLR 308 (subd 4). Damiani, J. P., Mangano, Thompson and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—■ In a medical malpractice and wrongful death action, defendant Springer appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Composta, J.), dated June 29, 1982, which, after a traverse hearing, denied his motion to dismiss the complaint as to him for lack of personal jurisdiction. Order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs. The deputy sheriff’s attempt to personally serve defendant Springer on three separate occasions at Springer’s combined home and office, at least one of which was during his office hours, constituted due diligence in attempting personal service as required under CPLR 308 (subd 4). Damiani, J. P., Mangano, Thompson and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Velez v. Springer, 92 A.D.2d 610, 460 N.Y.S.2d 61, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16873 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

92 A.D.2d 610 (Velez v. Springer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related