Velez v. Gines-Velez

299 A.D.2d 346, 749 N.Y.S.2d 154, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10509

This text of 299 A.D.2d 346 (Velez v. Gines-Velez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Velez v. Gines-Velez, 299 A.D.2d 346, 749 N.Y.S.2d 154, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10509 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.), entered April 26, 2001, which, upon a jury verdict in favor of the defendants and against them on the issue of liability, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contentions, the verdict was based upon a fair interpretation of the evidence (see Hershkowitz v Saint Michel, 143 AD2d 809; Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 134).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. Feuerstein, J.P., S. Miller, Friedmann and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nicastro v. Park
113 A.D.2d 129 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Hershkowitz v. Michel
143 A.D.2d 809 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
299 A.D.2d 346, 749 N.Y.S.2d 154, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/velez-v-gines-velez-nyappdiv-2002.