Velez v. Gines-Velez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Velez v. Gines-Velez

299 A.D.2d 346, 749 N.Y.S.2d 154, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10509

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 4, 2002·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.), entered April 26, 2001, which, upon a jury verdict in favor of the defendants and against them on the issue of liability, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contentions, the verdict was based upon a fair interpretation of the evidence (see Hershkowitz v Saint Michel, 143 AD2d 809; Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 134).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. Feuerstein, J.P., S. Miller, Friedmann and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.), entered April 26, 2001, which, upon a jury verdict in favor of the defendants and against them on the issue of liability, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contentions, the verdict was based upon a fair interpretation of the evidence (see Hershkowitz v Saint Michel, 143 AD2d 809; Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 134).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. Feuerstein, J.P., S. Miller, Friedmann and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Velez v. Gines-Velez, 299 A.D.2d 346, 749 N.Y.S.2d 154, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10509 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

299 A.D.2d 346 (Velez v. Gines-Velez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related