Velez v. City of New York

2025 NY Slip Op 04683
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 13, 2025
DocketIndex No. 500315/19
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 04683 (Velez v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Velez v. City of New York, 2025 NY Slip Op 04683 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Velez v City of New York (2025 NY Slip Op 04683)

Velez v City of New York
2025 NY Slip Op 04683
Decided on August 13, 2025
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on August 13, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
BETSY BARROS, J.P.
LINDA CHRISTOPHER
BARRY E. WARHIT
JAMES P. MCCORMACK, JJ.

2024-05250
(Index No. 500315/19)

[*1]Raul Velez, respondent,

v

City of New York, et al., appellants.


Anna J. Ervolina, Brooklyn, NY (Theresa A. Frame of counsel), for appellants.

Elefterakis, Elefterakis & Panek, New York, NY (Harris J. Zakarin of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Leon Ruchelsman, J.), dated April 22, 2024. The order, insofar as appealed from, upon granting the plaintiff's motion to restore the action to active status, set a schedule for the deposition of six defendants' witnesses.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

As acknowledged by the defendants, the portion of the order from which this appeal is taken did not decide a motion made on notice (see CPLR 5701[a]) and, therefore, is not appealable as of right. Leave to appeal has not been granted.

BARROS, J.P., CHRISTOPHER, WARHIT and MCCORMACK, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 5701
New York CVP § 5701
§ 431
New York JUD § 431

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 04683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/velez-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2025.