Velez v. Bratton

240 A.D.2d 211, 658 N.Y.S.2d 877, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6176
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 10, 1997·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen Crane, J.), entered July 25, 1996, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 challenging respondents’ discharge of petitioner as a probationary police officer, granted respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The petition was properly dismissed without a hearing on the ground that the determination of the State Department of Labor that petitioner did not commit misconduct disentitling him to unemployment insurance benefits has no collateral estoppel effect, and that petitioner’s allegations of bad faith were otherwise conclusory (Matter of Gault v Abate, 210 AD2d 56, lv denied 85 NY2d 803; Matter of Beacham v Brown, 215 AD2d 334). Concur—Wallach, J. P., Nardelli, Rubin, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Velez v. Bratton, 240 A.D.2d 211, 658 N.Y.S.2d 877, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6176 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

240 A.D.2d 211 (Velez v. Bratton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. Kelly
35 A.D.3d 297 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Cieszkowska v. New York State Division of Human Rights
305 A.D.2d 169 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)