Velez v. Bratton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Velez v. Bratton

240 A.D.2d 211, 658 N.Y.S.2d 877, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6176

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 10, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 240 A.D.2d 211 (Velez v. Bratton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Velez v. Bratton, 240 A.D.2d 211, 658 N.Y.S.2d 877, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6176 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen Crane, J.), entered July 25, 1996, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 challenging respondents’ discharge of petitioner as a probationary police officer, granted respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The petition was properly dismissed without a hearing on the ground that the determination of the State Department of Labor that petitioner did not commit misconduct disentitling him to unemployment insurance benefits has no collateral estoppel effect, and that petitioner’s allegations of bad faith were otherwise conclusory (Matter of Gault v Abate, 210 AD2d 56, lv denied 85 NY2d 803; Matter of Beacham v Brown, 215 AD2d 334). Concur—Wallach, J. P., Nardelli, Rubin, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen Crane, J.), entered July 25, 1996, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 challenging respondents’ discharge of petitioner as a probationary police officer, granted respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The petition was properly dismissed without a hearing on the ground that the determination of the State Department of Labor that petitioner did not commit misconduct disentitling him to unemployment insurance benefits has no collateral estoppel effect, and that petitioner’s allegations of bad faith were otherwise conclusory (Matter of Gault v Abate, 210 AD2d 56, lv denied 85 NY2d 803; Matter of Beacham v Brown, 215 AD2d 334). Concur—Wallach, J. P., Nardelli, Rubin, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D.2d 211, 658 N.Y.S.2d 877, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/velez-v-bratton-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack