Veldhuis v. Greenwich Federal, No. Cv91 0117578 S (Oct. 18, 1991)

Connecticut Superior Court

Veldhuis v. Greenwich Federal, No. Cv91 0117578 S (Oct. 18, 1991)

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 8650

Connecticut Superior Court·Decided October 18, 1991·No. No. CV91 0117578 S·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The present action seeks to recover damages against attorney Gary Cahill, and others, for actions taken by Attorney Cahill in the performance of his duties while acting as a duly appointed Committee of the Superior Court in other litigation.

An officer of the court appointed by judicial authority is not subject to suit without leave of the court granted in the cause in which the appointment was made. Hartford Federal Savings and Loan Ass'n. v. Tucker, 196 Conn. 172, 178 (1985), cert. den. 474 U.S. 920 (1985); Links v. Connecticut River Banking Company, 66 Conn. 277,284 (1985); Walsh v. Raymond, 58 Conn. 251, 255 (1989).

The plaintiffs have not alleged that they have received permission to institute the present litigation, nor do they claim that such permission was granted. Accordingly, the Motion to Dismiss filed by the defendant, Cahill, is hereby granted.

RUSH, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The present action seeks to recover damages against attorney Gary Cahill, and others, for actions taken by Attorney Cahill in the performance of his duties while acting as a duly appointed Committee of the Superior Court in other litigation.

An officer of the court appointed by judicial authority is not subject to suit without leave of the court granted in the cause in which the appointment was made. Hartford Federal Savings and Loan Ass'n. v. Tucker, 196 Conn. 172, 178 (1985), cert. den. 474 U.S. 920 (1985); Links v. Connecticut River Banking Company, 66 Conn. 277,284 (1985); Walsh v. Raymond, 58 Conn. 251, 255 (1989).

The plaintiffs have not alleged that they have received permission to institute the present litigation, nor do they claim that such permission was granted. Accordingly, the Motion to Dismiss filed by the defendant, Cahill, is hereby granted.

RUSH, J.

Veldhuis v. Greenwich Federal, No. Cv91 0117578 S (Oct. 18, 1991), 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 8650 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 8650 (Veldhuis v. Greenwich Federal, No. Cv91 0117578 S (Oct. 18, 1991)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related