Veldhuis v. Greenwich Federal, No. Cv91 0117578 S (Oct. 18, 1991)

Connecticut Superior Court

Veldhuis v. Greenwich Federal, No. Cv91 0117578 S (Oct. 18, 1991)

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 8650

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedOctober 18, 1991

DocketNo. CV91 0117578 S

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 8650 (Veldhuis v. Greenwich Federal, No. Cv91 0117578 S (Oct. 18, 1991)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Veldhuis v. Greenwich Federal, No. Cv91 0117578 S (Oct. 18, 1991), 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 8650 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The present action seeks to recover damages against attorney Gary Cahill, and others, for actions taken by Attorney Cahill in the performance of his duties while acting as a duly appointed Committee of the Superior Court in other litigation.

An officer of the court appointed by judicial authority is not subject to suit without leave of the court granted in the cause in which the appointment was made. Hartford Federal Savings and Loan Ass'n. v. Tucker, 196 Conn. 172, 178 (1985), cert. den. 474 U.S. 920 (1985); Links v. Connecticut River Banking Company, 66 Conn. 277,284 (1985); Walsh v. Raymond, 58 Conn. 251, 255 (1989).

The plaintiffs have not alleged that they have received permission to institute the present litigation, nor do they claim that such permission was granted. Accordingly, the Motion to Dismiss filed by the defendant, Cahill, is hereby granted.

RUSH, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The present action seeks to recover damages against attorney Gary Cahill, and others, for actions taken by Attorney Cahill in the performance of his duties while acting as a duly appointed Committee of the Superior Court in other litigation.

An officer of the court appointed by judicial authority is not subject to suit without leave of the court granted in the cause in which the appointment was made. Hartford Federal Savings and Loan Ass'n. v. Tucker, 196 Conn. 172, 178 (1985), cert. den. 474 U.S. 920 (1985); Links v. Connecticut River Banking Company, 66 Conn. 277,284 (1985); Walsh v. Raymond, 58 Conn. 251, 255 (1989).

The plaintiffs have not alleged that they have received permission to institute the present litigation, nor do they claim that such permission was granted. Accordingly, the Motion to Dismiss filed by the defendant, Cahill, is hereby granted.

RUSH, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 8650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/veldhuis-v-greenwich-federal-no-cv91-0117578-s-oct-18-1991-connsuperct-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack