Velazquez v. Pereira

257 A.D.2d 432, 683 N.Y.S.2d 508, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 237
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 12, 1999·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.), entered on or about May 29, 1998, which denied defendants-appellants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We agree with the IAS Court that an issue of fact exists as to whether defendants’ shoveling of snow in front of the residential portion of their building created or increased the allegedly icy condition in front of the building’s commercial premises, where plaintiff allegedly fell (see, Glick v City of New York, 139 AD2d 402). Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Nardelli, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Velazquez v. Pereira, 257 A.D.2d 432, 683 N.Y.S.2d 508, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 237 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

257 A.D.2d 432 (Velazquez v. Pereira) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peasah v. C&S Value Stores, Inc.
306 A.D.2d 14 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Lynch v. City of New York
304 A.D.2d 456 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)