Velazquez v. Metropolitan Dade County

442 So. 2d 1036, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25174
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 13, 1983·No. No. 83-1140·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reject the plaintiff’s challenge to section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1981), as an unconstitutional denial of access to the courts. Our supreme court has responded to the issues raised herein when it decided Slaughter v. Tyler, 126 Fla. 515, 171 So. 320 (1936), overruled on other grounds, Manning v. Serrano, 97 So.2d 688 (Fla.1957); accord Gasparro v. Horner, 245 So.2d 901 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971). Since the emancipated minor in the present case had access to the courts through his natural parents, the statute of limitations was not tolled during his minority.

Consequently, the order dismissing the complaint is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Velazquez v. Metropolitan Dade County, 442 So. 2d 1036, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25174 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

442 So. 2d 1036 (Velazquez v. Metropolitan Dade County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bailey ex rel. Bailey v. Rodriguez
559 So. 2d 386 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Lindabury v. Lindabury
552 So. 2d 1117 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Drake ex rel. Fletcher v. Island Community Church, Inc.
462 So. 2d 1142 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Drake v. ISLAND COMMUNITY CHURCH
462 So. 2d 1142 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)