Velazquez v. Commission
53 So. 3d 1237, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1929, 2011 WL 613367
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 16, 2011·No. No. 3D10-2921·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We dismiss this appeal as untimely. As in Etienne v. Simco Recycling Corp., 721 So.2d 399 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), our dismissal is without prejudice. Alejandro Velazquez is free to ask the Unemployment Appeals Commission to vacate and re-enter the operative order. If the Commission cooperates, then Velazquez may timely appeal the re-entered order. If not, then he may appeal the Commission’s refusal to re-enter the order.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Velazquez v. Commission, 53 So. 3d 1237, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1929, 2011 WL 613367 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).
53 So. 3d 1237 (Velazquez v. Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Filarski v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission
97 So. 3d 278 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)