Velazquez v. Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Velazquez v. Commission

53 So. 3d 1237, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1929, 2011 WL 613367

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 16, 2011

DocketNo. 3D10-2921

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 53 So. 3d 1237 (Velazquez v. Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Velazquez v. Commission, 53 So. 3d 1237, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1929, 2011 WL 613367 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We dismiss this appeal as untimely. As in Etienne v. Simco Recycling Corp., 721 So.2d 399 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), our dismissal is without prejudice. Alejandro Velazquez is free to ask the Unemployment Appeals Commission to vacate and re-enter the operative order. If the Commission cooperates, then Velazquez may timely appeal the re-entered order. If not, then he may appeal the Commission’s refusal to re-enter the order.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We dismiss this appeal as untimely. As in Etienne v. Simco Recycling Corp., 721 So.2d 399 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), our dismissal is without prejudice. Alejandro Velazquez is free to ask the Unemployment Appeals Commission to vacate and re-enter the operative order. If the Commission cooperates, then Velazquez may timely appeal the re-entered order. If not, then he may appeal the Commission’s refusal to re-enter the order.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 So. 3d 1237, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1929, 2011 WL 613367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/velazquez-v-commission-fladistctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack