Velazquez v. Ashcroft
This text of 98 F. App'x 675 (Velazquez v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[676]*676MEMORANDUM
Leodegario Pineda Velazquez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen deportation proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). We review denials of motions to reopen for abuse of discretion, Shaar v. INS, 141 F.3d 953, 955 (9th Cir.1998), and we deny the petition.
The BIA permissibly denied the Petitioner’s motion to reopen after determining that he failed to depart the United States before his voluntary departure deadline expired. See id. at 957-58.
The Petitioner’s remaining contentions lack merit.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
98 F. App'x 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/velazquez-v-ashcroft-ca9-2004.