VELAZQUEZ-CRUZ, EX PARTE GUSTAVO v. the State of Texas

• Court: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
• Decided: December 11, 2024
• Docket: PD-0779-23
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

NOS. PD-0726-23, PD-0739-23, PD-0771-23, PD-0779-23, PD-0793-23 & PD-0900-23

EX PARTE JOSUE ISAY DEL CAMPO-CHAVEZ, JUAN LUIS BALTAZAR- PEREZ, ALDO GALINDO-ZAMORA, GUSTAVO VELAZQUEZ-CRUZ, PERFECTO TREJO-RUBIO & IVAN GALINDO-CHAVEZ, Appellees

ON STATE’S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE SAN ANTONIO COURT OF APPEALS ZAPATA COUNTY

Per curiam. YEARY, J., dissented. OPINION

In each of these cases, Appellee was arrested for trespassing on private property.

See TEX. PENAL CODE § 30.05(a). He filed a pretrial application for a writ of habeas

corpus, arguing that the State was selectively prosecuting him in violation of his equal

protection rights. In each case, the trial court granted relief, the State appealed, and the

court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s ruling granting relief.1

1 Ex parte Del Campo-Chavez, 674 S.W.3d 714 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2023); Ex parte Baltazar-Perez, No. 04-22-00740-CR (Tex. App.—San Antonio August 30, The State has filed a petition for discretionary review in each case, challenging the

court of appeals’ holding that Appellee’s claim is cognizable in a pretrial habeas

application. We recently handed down our opinion in Ex parte Aparicio, No. PD-0461-

23, ___ S.W.3d ___ (Tex. Crim. App. October 9, 2024), in which we held that Aparicio’s

selective prosecution claim was cognizable in a pretrial habeas application. We also held

that Aparicio did not make a prima facie showing that he was arrested and prosecuted

because of his gender.

Consistent with our opinion in Aparicio, we grant review on our own motion of the

following ground in each case:

Did Appellee make a prima facie showing that he was arrested and prosecuted because of his gender?

Accordingly, in each case, we vacate the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the

case to that court in light of our opinion in Aparicio. The State’s petitions are refused. No

motions for rehearing will be entertained, and the Clerk is instructed to immediately issue

mandate.

DATE DELIVERED: DECEMBER 11, 2024 DO NOT PUBLISH

2023); Ex parte Galindo-Zamora, No. 04-22-00739-CR (Tex. App.—San Antonio September 27, 2023); Ex parte Velazquez-Cruz, No. 04-22-00742-CR (Tex. App.—San Antonio September 13, 2023); Ex parte Trejo-Rubio, No. 04-22-00741-CR (Tex. App.—San Antonio September 27, 2023); Ex parte Galindo-Chavez, No. 04-22-00738-CR (Tex. App.—San Antonio October 4, 2023).