Velasquez v. State Accident Insurance Fund
This text of 556 P.2d 972 (Velasquez v. State Accident Insurance Fund) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
State Accident Insurance Fund (SAIF) appeals from an order of the circuit court reversing the hearings referee and the Workmen’s Compensation Board and increasing claimant’s award from 120 for 37.5 percent unscheduled low back disability to permanent total disability. The court based its ruling on the conclusion that claimant’s disability fell within the odd-lot category.
In August 1970 claimant slipped and fell in the kitchen of her husband’s restaurant, where she worked as a waitress. Her disability was specifically attributed by the reviewing physician to mechanical low back pain estimated at 30 percent impairment. She is 40 years of age and has a verbal I.Q. in the above normal range.
Evidence of motivation to seek and work at gainful employment is necessary to establish a prima facie case of odd-lot status under the facts of this case. Deaton v. SAIF, 13 Or App 298, 509 P2d 1215 (1973). Based upon our de novo review of the record, we conclude that the claimant lacks the requisite motivation to return to work, and that the referee’s award, affirmed by the Board, is correct.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
556 P.2d 972, 27 Or. App. 429, 1976 Ore. App. LEXIS 1469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/velasquez-v-state-accident-insurance-fund-orctapp-1976.