Velasquez v. Empire Refrigeration & Air Conditioning, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Velasquez v. Empire Refrigeration & Air Conditioning, Inc.

309 A.D.2d 926, 766 N.Y.S.2d 104, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11066

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 27, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 309 A.D.2d 926 (Velasquez v. Empire Refrigeration & Air Conditioning, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Velasquez v. Empire Refrigeration & Air Conditioning, Inc., 309 A.D.2d 926, 766 N.Y.S.2d 104, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11066 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Covello, J.), dated June 27, 2002, as granted the motion of the defendant third-party plaintiff for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

The defendant third-party plaintiff established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Espinal v Melville Snow Contrs., 98 NY2d 136 [2002]; Hoffman v Second Beach Hills Corp., 304 AD2d 716 [2003]). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

In light of our determination, we need not reach the plaintiffs’ remaining contention. Altman, J.P., H. Miller, Adams and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Covello, J.), dated June 27, 2002, as granted the motion of the defendant third-party plaintiff for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

The defendant third-party plaintiff established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Espinal v Melville Snow Contrs., 98 NY2d 136 [2002]; Hoffman v Second Beach Hills Corp., 304 AD2d 716 [2003]). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

In light of our determination, we need not reach the plaintiffs’ remaining contention. Altman, J.P., H. Miller, Adams and Townes, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

309 A.D.2d 926, 766 N.Y.S.2d 104, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11066, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/velasquez-v-empire-refrigeration-air-conditioning-inc-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack