Velasquez, Joe C.

• Court: Texas Supreme Court
• Decided: July 1, 2015
• Docket: WR-80,116-02
• Status: Published

Opinion

.. ' 1S'Q ·ll4? -t~ CAUSENO. 6477; CAUSE NO. 7043; CAUSE NO. 7045

JOE C. VELASQUEZ § IN THE 32N° JUDICIAL

TDCJ-ID # 1514824 § DISTRICT COURT OF /{'>. SID# TX06382761 § MITCHELL<~OBNTY, TX "· '

RELATOR §

V. §

MITCHELL COUNTY §

COURT REPORTER § RECEIVED IN MARY MARGARET SPARKS-COX /tOURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

JUL 012015 OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER

TEXAS CSR 1946 · Abel Acosta, Cieri<

.A PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL APR.E CATION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS ~~~" ' ' ~,)

TO THE HONO~BLE l i~E~~F A;},, "\.. SAID COURT: ' '<~~~ y COME~~~O~,'J~~t;~)ELASQUEZ, RELATOR, PROSE IN THE ABOVE-STYLED AND NUMBERED' CAUSE OF ACTIONS AND FILES THIS ORIGINAL APPLICATION FOR ~~<

W '{ :r OF MANDAMUS. \

I

JOE C. VELASQUEZ; TDCJ # 1514824, IS AN OFFENDER INCARCERATED IN THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND IS APPEARING PROSE. WHO CAN BE LOCATED AT THE THOMAS GOREE UNIT, 7405 HWY. 75 SOUTH, .

HUNTSVILLE, TEXAS 17344. RELATOR HAS EXHAUSTED HIS REMEDIES AND HAS NO OTHER ADEQUATE REMEDY AT LAW. THE ACT SOUGHT TO BE COMPELLED IS MINISTERIAL, NOT DISCRETIONARY IN NATURE. RESPONDENT IS REQUIRED TO MAKE AVAILABLE A TRANSCRIPT COPY OF A TRIAL COURTS PROCEEDINGS FOR APPEALS AND BE TRANSCRIPTED TO AN APPELLATE COURT FOR REVIEW IF THERE ARE ISSUES TO RESOLVED

II ,3~/:>,~-~- "'·,'\w, RESPONDENT: MARY MARGARET SPARKS-COX, IN HER c 1 AQifY AS;COURT "'>, ' / ; ''-.......~\............

REPORTER OF MITCHELL COUNTY, TEXAS HAS A M~ISTE \ ~k9DTY TO MAKE COPIES AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST OF THE TRIAL~T~S'®\Jif f / ~~\ '~~~ ....

~~

V\ ..,III'•·,'¢~>, • .. ' '- '\ £:-:--.

THE RESPONDENT HAS FAILED TO P~OVIn'~;icoMPLETE COPY UPON .-'" ~· ·-' .· ...... ' 1: NUMEROUS REQUESTS OF THETRIACCOURTS TRANSCRIPT, FOR THE PURPOSE ' ' ,.," \' ., .

OF FILING AN APPLICATION FORWRI't-OF HABEAS CORPUS. RELATOR HAS ,f ·"~~·.··>~' ~'. ·'

REPEATEDLY PUT RESP0NDENT ON-NOTICE THAT RELATOR SEEKS THE ' ',\~~>·~ \fi

TRANSMITTAL OF T:HE CO'Ni·PLBITE COPY OF THE TRIAL COURTS TRANSCRIPT. '\::.~~ ~~~?~c~~'J:t,. ~~~ TO RELA!fOR'S;,EFFORTS, RESPONDENT HAS WHOLLY FAILED TO COMPLY WITH TH~ RGtE~35F··~~LLATE PROCEDURE, AND IS ACTING IN BAD FAITH, AND ,h ·,)''A / . FAI:l0ED TO AFFORD RELATOR THE PROFESSIONAL AND COMMON COURTESY OF "'l,~. ~<-:.~ "*'? jifo

ANY WRIJYTEN RESPONSE AS TO THE FAILED AND INCOMPLETE REQUESTS. JVr IV

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED RELATOR JOE C. VELASQUEZ, PRO SE, RESPECTFULLY REQUEST A FINDING THAT THE RESPONDENT DID NOT TRANSMIT THE COMPLETE COURT TRIAL TRANSCRIPT WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME AFTER THE DATE THEY WERE REQUESTED AND THE RELATOR BROUGHT THIS LITIGATION IN GOOD FAITH AND HAS SUBSTANTIALLY PREVAILED . '\, "H.~ RELATOR PRAYS FOR AN ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO TRANSMIT THE ,.:;,__.., . ., '·,,,%-. ,..,.¥ COMPLETE TRANSCRIPT OF THE TRIAL COURTS PROCEEDINGS~ONWMARCH 13, '-i<:<,