Velardi v. Schaal (In re Velardi)

Second Circuit

Velardi v. Schaal (In re Velardi)

213 B.R. 624, 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 2002, 1997 WL 709655

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Second Circuit·Decided November 12, 1997·No. BAP No. 97-50025·Published

Opinion

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

BROZMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.

This appeal was filed by the Debtor. Because he has failed to (i) perfect his appeal, (ii) respond to the Appellee’s motion to dismiss his appeal (“Motion”), and (in) demonstrate that he has standing to appeal, see Lee v. Board of Governors, 118 F.3d 905, 910 (2d Cir.1997) (“the party invoking the authority of the court bears the burden of proof on the issue of standing”(quoting Worth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 501-02, 95 S.Ct. 2197, 2206-07, [625] 45 L.Ed.2d 343 (1975))), Appellee’s Motion is hereby granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

BROZMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.

This appeal was filed by the Debtor. Because he has failed to (i) perfect his appeal, (ii) respond to the Appellee’s motion to dismiss his appeal (“Motion”), and (in) demonstrate that he has standing to appeal, see Lee v. Board of Governors, 118 F.3d 905, 910 (2d Cir.1997) (“the party invoking the authority of the court bears the burden of proof on the issue of standing”(quoting Worth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 501-02, 95 S.Ct. 2197, 2206-07, [625] 45 L.Ed.2d 343 (1975))), Appellee’s Motion is hereby granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Velardi v. Schaal (In re Velardi), 213 B.R. 624, 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 2002, 1997 WL 709655 (bap2 1997).

Pincite

213 B.R. 624 (Velardi v. Schaal (In re Velardi)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related