Velardi v. Lerman

203 A.D.2d 929, 612 N.Y.S.2d 1007
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 15, 1994
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 203 A.D.2d 929 (Velardi v. Lerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Velardi v. Lerman, 203 A.D.2d 929, 612 N.Y.S.2d 1007 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Because plaintiffs mechanic’s lien had expired, Supreme Court erred in denying defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s first cause of action to foreclose that lien. Supreme Court properly denied, however, defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s causes of action for breach of contract and quantum meruit because, accepting as true the evidence presented by plaintiff, there is at least arguably a triable issue (see, Hourigan v McGarry, 106 AD2d 845, appeal dismissed 65 NY2d 637). Supreme Court’s order is modified, therefore, to grant in part defendants’ motion for [930]*930summary judgment by dismissing plaintiffs first cause of action. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Tenney, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Pine, J. P., Law-ton, Fallon, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

John Mezzalingua Associates., Inc. v. Walker
6 A.D.3d 1158 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Apple v. Apple
307 A.D.2d 753 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 A.D.2d 929, 612 N.Y.S.2d 1007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/velardi-v-lerman-nyappdiv-1994.