Veitch & Co. v. Basye & Metcalf

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Veitch & Co. v. Basye & Metcalf

28 F. Cas. 1136, 2 D.C. 6, 2 Cranch 6

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedJuly 15, 1810

StatusPublished

This text of 28 F. Cas. 1136 (Veitch & Co. v. Basye & Metcalf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Veitch & Co. v. Basye & Metcalf, 28 F. Cas. 1136, 2 D.C. 6, 2 Cranch 6 (circtddc 1810).

Pincite

Opinion

The CouRT

(Thruston, J., absent,)

instructed the jury, that if they should be satisfied, by the evidence, that the note with the indorsement was delivered to Cooper & Company, the indorsement was prima facie evidence that it was transferred to Cooper & Company for value received, and throw the burden of proof upon the plaintiffs, to show that it was either put into the hands of Cooper & Company for collection, or was retransferred, or that Veitch & Company had repaid to Cooper & Company the value received. - -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The CouRT

(Thruston, J., absent,)

instructed the jury, that if they should be satisfied, by the evidence, that the note with the indorsement was delivered to Cooper & Company, the indorsement was prima facie evidence that it was transferred to Cooper & Company for value received, and throw the burden of proof upon the plaintiffs, to show that it was either put into the hands of Cooper & Company for collection, or was retransferred, or that Veitch & Company had repaid to Cooper & Company the value received. - -

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 F. Cas. 1136, 2 D.C. 6, 2 Cranch 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/veitch-co-v-basye-metcalf-circtddc-1810.