Veit v. Smith

241 A.D. 687
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 15, 1934
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 241 A.D. 687 (Veit v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Veit v. Smith, 241 A.D. 687 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

Order of December 4, 1933, reversed on the law and the facts, defendants’ motion to open the default, made on the trial, granted, and the judgment vacated, without costs, on condition that within ten days from the entry of the order herein the defendants pay the plaintiff fifty dollars costs and the disbursements of plaintiff on this appeal; and on the further condition that within the same time the defendants give an undertaking, with corporate surety, in the sum of $2,674.68, to secure the payment of any judgment which the plaintiff may recover in the action. In the event of defendants’ failure to comply with the foregoing conditions the order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The grounds of the conditional reversal are that the default of the defendants on the trial was not deliberate, willful or in bad faith, but occurred under circumstances where they and their counsel were not seriously blamable. They should be permitted to present their defenses on a trial — there appearing to be merits in the defenses alleged in the answers. (See Baldwin v. Yellow Taxi Corporation, 221 App. Div. 717.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gallagher v. Tantalo
10 Misc. 2d 1029 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
In re the Estate of McCleary
268 A.D. 929 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 A.D. 687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/veit-v-smith-nyappdiv-1934.