Veit v. Eastman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Veit v. Eastman

856 S.W.2d 72, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1684, 1993 WL 146784

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 11, 1993·No. No. 61264·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Bruce Eastman, appeals entry of a partial summary judgment in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, in favor of respondent, Richard R. Veit, on his claim for unlawful detainer. We affirm. We also find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We therefore affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, [73]*73solely for their own information, explaining the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Bruce Eastman, appeals entry of a partial summary judgment in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, in favor of respondent, Richard R. Veit, on his claim for unlawful detainer. We affirm. We also find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We therefore affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, [73]*73solely for their own information, explaining the reasons for our decision.

Veit v. Eastman, 856 S.W.2d 72, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1684, 1993 WL 146784 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

856 S.W.2d 72 (Veit v. Eastman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.