Veil v. Thompson

150 N.Y.S. 659, 1914 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1299
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedDecember 24, 1914
StatusPublished

This text of 150 N.Y.S. 659 (Veil v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Veil v. Thompson, 150 N.Y.S. 659, 1914 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1299 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

BIJUR, J.

Plaintiff sued to recover damages for false representaalleged to made by defendants, relying upon which the plaintiff bought certain bonds, to his loss as proved. The representations proved to have been made by defendants were that no other bonds of this issue were on the market, and that they were shortly to be retired at an advanced price. These representations were of facts which were material, and warranted the recovery which the jury awarded. They were not representations as to matters of opinion, and the verdict should not have been set aside.

Order reversed, with costs, and verdict reinstated, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
150 N.Y.S. 659, 1914 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/veil-v-thompson-nyappterm-1914.