Veil Check Cashing Corp. v. New York State Banking Department

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Veil Check Cashing Corp. v. New York State Banking Department

216 A.D.2d 114, 627 N.Y.S.2d 927, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6372

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 216 A.D.2d 114 (Veil Check Cashing Corp. v. New York State Banking Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Veil Check Cashing Corp. v. New York State Banking Department, 216 A.D.2d 114, 627 N.Y.S.2d 927, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6372 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Kristin Glen, J.), entered on or about May 31, 1994, which denied petitioner’s application to annul respondent agency’s determination granting corespondent a check cashing license, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent agency’s grant of the license, which considered, inter alia, corespondent’s prior application and its relationship with its parent company, had a foundation in fact and was not arbitrary and capricious nor an abuse of discretion. Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Kristin Glen, J.), entered on or about May 31, 1994, which denied petitioner’s application to annul respondent agency’s determination granting corespondent a check cashing license, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent agency’s grant of the license, which considered, inter alia, corespondent’s prior application and its relationship with its parent company, had a foundation in fact and was not arbitrary and capricious nor an abuse of discretion. Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 A.D.2d 114, 627 N.Y.S.2d 927, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/veil-check-cashing-corp-v-new-york-state-banking-department-nyappdiv-1995.