Veiga v. Suntrust Bank

450 F. App'x 269
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 17, 2011
DocketNo. 11-1219
StatusPublished

This text of 450 F. App'x 269 (Veiga v. Suntrust Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Veiga v. Suntrust Bank, 450 F. App'x 269 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

[270]*270Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Aaron Holsey appeals the order of the magistrate judge approving the settlement of this class action lawsuit and rejecting Holse/s objection to the settlement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Veiga, v. Holsey, No. 1:09-cv-02815-PWG (D. Md. filed Feb. 23, 2011, entered Feb. 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
450 F. App'x 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/veiga-v-suntrust-bank-ca4-2011.