Veiga v. Friedlander

225 N.E.2d 213, 19 N.Y.2d 650, 278 N.Y.S.2d 621, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1779
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 14, 1967
StatusPublished

This text of 225 N.E.2d 213 (Veiga v. Friedlander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Veiga v. Friedlander, 225 N.E.2d 213, 19 N.Y.2d 650, 278 N.Y.S.2d 621, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1779 (N.Y. 1967).

Opinion

[652]*652Order reversed and case remitted to the Appellate Division for its determination of the facts, with costs to abide the event. The negligence of plaintiff and defendant drivers as they approached the intersection presented a question of fact for resolution by the jury. Since the Appellate Division in reversing the judgment for plaintiffs on the law expressly stated it had not considered the facts, the case must be remitted to that court for its consideration of the facts (CPLR 5613).

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi, Bbegan, Keating and Breitel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 N.E.2d 213, 19 N.Y.2d 650, 278 N.Y.S.2d 621, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/veiga-v-friedlander-ny-1967.