Vegliante v. State of New Jersey

41 F. App'x 595
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJuly 30, 2002
DocketNo. 01-3972
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 41 F. App'x 595 (Vegliante v. State of New Jersey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vegliante v. State of New Jersey, 41 F. App'x 595 (3d Cir. 2002).

Opinion

BENCH OPINION

AMBRO, Circuit Judge.

The Supreme Court stated in Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida, 517 U.S. 44, 72-73, 116 S.Ct. 1114, 134 L.Ed.2d 252 (1996), that “the 11th Amendment restricts the judicial power under Article III, and Article I cannot be used to circumvent the constitutional limitations placed upon federal jurisdiction.” In In Re: Sacred Heart Hospital of Norristown, 133 F.3d 237 (3d Cir.1998), we observed that “since Seminole Tribe, Section 5 of the 14th Amendment has been the sole basis for Congress to abrogate the States’ immunity under the 11th Amendment.” Id. at 242 (quoting College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board, 131 F.3d 353, 358 (3d Cir.1997)). We held in Sacred Heart that the bankruptcy clause is not a valid source of abrogation power. Sacred Heart, 133 F.3d at 243.

In this case, Vegliante asks us to allow him to pursue an adversary proceeding in bankruptcy against the State of New Jersey. The adversary proceeding at issue is plainly a suit within the meaning of the 11th Amendment. Missouri v. Fiske, 290 U.S. 18, 26, 54 S.Ct. 18, 78 L.Ed. 145 (1933) (quoting Cuhens v. Virginia, 6 Wheat. 264, 19 U.S. 264, 5 L.Ed. 257 (1821)). The State of New Jersey received a summons requiring it to appear in court or face a default judgment against it. That qualifies as a suit. See id.

Vegliante seeks to prosecute a suit against the State of New Jersey without its consent. We cannot oblige that request in light of Sacred Heart’s ruling on state sovereign immunity. Therefore, the District Court’s order is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 F. App'x 595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vegliante-v-state-of-new-jersey-ca3-2002.