Vega v. Vega

Nebraska Supreme Court

Vega v. Vega

408 N.W.2d 309, 225 Neb. 821, 1987 Neb. LEXIS 962

Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided July 2, 1987·No. No. 85-833·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The respondent husband, Victor Orlando Vega, has appealed from the order of the district court, which modified the parties’ decree of dissolution as to visitation. Having reviewed the record de novo as we are required to do, we conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in regard to setting the visitation allowed the appellant. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The respondent husband, Victor Orlando Vega, has appealed from the order of the district court, which modified the parties’ decree of dissolution as to visitation. Having reviewed the record de novo as we are required to do, we conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in regard to setting the visitation allowed the appellant. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Vega v. Vega, 408 N.W.2d 309, 225 Neb. 821, 1987 Neb. LEXIS 962 (Neb. 1987).

Pincite

408 N.W.2d 309 (Vega v. Vega) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.