Vega v. Shitama

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Vega v. Shitama

855 So. 2d 147, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12189, 2003 WL 21939284

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 14, 2003

DocketNo. 1D03-2642

StatusPublished

This text of 855 So. 2d 147 (Vega v. Shitama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vega v. Shitama, 855 So. 2d 147, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12189, 2003 WL 21939284 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Court has determined that because the appellant’s motion for rehearing was not timely served, it did not delay rendition of the final judgment. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.530; Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h). Consequently, the appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely filed and this Court lacks jurisdiction to review the order on appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed.

DISMISSED.

ERVIN, BARFIELD and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Court has determined that because the appellant’s motion for rehearing was not timely served, it did not delay rendition of the final judgment. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.530; Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h). Consequently, the appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely filed and this Court lacks jurisdiction to review the order on appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed.

DISMISSED.

ERVIN, BARFIELD and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

855 So. 2d 147, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12189, 2003 WL 21939284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vega-v-shitama-fladistctapp-2003.