Vega v. Saleeby

126 F. App'x 626
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 25, 2005·No. No. 04-2017·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Scott David Vega appeals the district court’s order awarding summary judgment to Defendants in his civil rights action arising out of a disciplinary proceeding that resulted in his suspension from The Citadel. We have reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Vega v. Saleeby, No. CA-04-23 (D.S.C. July 12, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vega v. Saleeby, 126 F. App'x 626 (4th Cir. 2005).

126 F. App'x 626 (Vega v. Saleeby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.