Vega v. Rotner Management Corp.

40 A.D.3d 473, 836 N.Y.S.2d 182
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 24, 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 40 A.D.3d 473 (Vega v. Rotner Management Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vega v. Rotner Management Corp., 40 A.D.3d 473, 836 N.Y.S.2d 182 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lucy Billings, J.), entered August 16, 2006, which, insofar as appealed from by defendants, granted plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of defendants’ liability under Labor Law § 240 (1), and denied defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment insofar as it sought to dismiss such cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Plaintiff s cross appeal from that part of the order which granted defendants’ cross motion to the extent of dismissing the cause of action under Labor Law § 241 (6), unanimously dismissed, without costs.

With respect to the section 240 (1) claim, plaintiff satisfied his prima facie burden on the motion with his testimony that [474]*474he fell to the ground, when the unsecured 8-to-10-foot ladder on which he was standing shifted (see Blake v Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of N.Y. City, 1 NY3d 280, 289 n 8 [2003]). It does not avail defendants to argue that the manner in which plaintiff set up and stood on the ladder was the sole cause of the accident, where there is no dispute that the ladder was unsecured and no other safety devices were provided (see Velasco v Green-Wood Cemetery, 8 AD3d 88, 89 [2004]). In view of the foregoing, and plaintiffs admission that in oral argument before the motion court, he agreed to proceed directly to a trial on damages in the event he were awarded partial summary judgment on the section 240 (1) claim, and would not immediately seek a trial on the issue of defendants’ liability under Labor Law § 241 (6), we decline to reach the issues raised in plaintiff’s cross appeal. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Nardelli, Buckley, Sweeny and Malone, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. 501 Madison-Sutton LLC
2025 NY Slip Op 31668(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2025)
White v. 31-01 Steinway, LLC
2018 NY Slip Op 6685 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Evans v. Syracuse Model Neighborhood Corp.
53 A.D.3d 1135 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 A.D.3d 473, 836 N.Y.S.2d 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vega-v-rotner-management-corp-nyappdiv-2007.