Vega v. Gonzales

188 F. App'x 583
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Vega v. Gonzales. Read the opinion of the Court — 161 F. App'x 727
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 3, 2006·No. No. 06-70189·Published

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the response to the court’s January 30, 2006 order to show cause, and we conclude that petitioner has failed to raise a colorable constitutional claim to invoke our jurisdiction over this petition for review. See Ramirez-Perez v. Ashcroft, 336 F.3d 1001 (9th Cir.2003); Torres-Aguilar v. INS, 246 F.3d 1267, 1271 (9th Cir.2001). Accordingly, we sua sponte dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003); Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 277 F.3d 1137, 1144 (9th Cir.2002).

All pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vega v. Gonzales, 188 F. App'x 583 (9th Cir. 2006).

188 F. App'x 583 (Vega v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related