Vega v. Germaine

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Vega v. Germaine

259 So. 3d 827

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 20, 2018

DocketCASE NO.: 2D18-3904

StatusPublished

This text of 259 So. 3d 827 (Vega v. Germaine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vega v. Germaine, 259 So. 3d 827 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Petitioner's petition for writ of mandamus is denied without prejudice. Petitioner is required to make an express and distinct demand for performance before mandamus will be considered. See Al-Hakim v. State, 783 So. 2d 293, 294 (Fla. 5th DCA2001) ("It is well-settled that in a civil proceeding, it is generally necessary to bring a pending matter to the trial court's attention by having it noticed for hearing.").

CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petitioner's petition for writ of mandamus is denied without prejudice. Petitioner is required to make an express and distinct demand for performance before mandamus will be considered. See Al-Hakim v. State, 783 So. 2d 293, 294 (Fla. 5th DCA2001) ("It is well-settled that in a civil proceeding, it is generally necessary to bring a pending matter to the trial court's attention by having it noticed for hearing.").

CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 So. 3d 827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vega-v-germaine-fladistctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack