Vega v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Vega v. Commonwealth

677 N.E.2d 218, 424 Mass. 1016, 1997 Mass. LEXIS 75

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedMarch 27, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 677 N.E.2d 218 (Vega v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vega v. Commonwealth, 677 N.E.2d 218, 424 Mass. 1016, 1997 Mass. LEXIS 75 (Mass. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Ramon Vega (defendant) has appealed from the denial by a single justice of this court of his petition for relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3. The defendant contended that he had been convicted and sentenced on a criminal complaint in violation of the requirement imposed by Commonwealth v. Duquette, 386 Mass. 834, 846-847 (1982). It is clear that the defendant had other remedies available to him which make relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3, inappropriate. The defendant’s claim does not meet the two-part test set forth in Morrissette v. Commonwealth, 380 Mass. 197, 198 (1980). “The single justice did not reserve and report the issue; nor did he decide the issue. He merely denied relief pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3. This appeal therefore is not properly before us.” Nettis v. Commonwealth, 415 Mass. 1001, 1001 (1993). See McClain v. Commonwealth, 421 Mass. 1005 (1995).

Appeal dismissed.

The case was submitted on briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ramon Vega (defendant) has appealed from the denial by a single justice of this court of his petition for relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3. The defendant contended that he had been convicted and sentenced on a criminal complaint in violation of the requirement imposed by Commonwealth v. Duquette, 386 Mass. 834, 846-847 (1982). It is clear that the defendant had other remedies available to him which make relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3, inappropriate. The defendant’s claim does not meet the two-part test set forth in Morrissette v. Commonwealth, 380 Mass. 197, 198 (1980). “The single justice did not reserve and report the issue; nor did he decide the issue. He merely denied relief pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3. This appeal therefore is not properly before us.” Nettis v. Commonwealth, 415 Mass. 1001, 1001 (1993). See McClain v. Commonwealth, 421 Mass. 1005 (1995).

Appeal dismissed.

The case was submitted on briefs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

677 N.E.2d 218, 424 Mass. 1016, 1997 Mass. LEXIS 75, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vega-v-commonwealth-mass-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack