Vega v. Bezio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Vega v. Bezio

105 A.D.3d 1229, 962 N.Y.S.2d 820

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 18, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 105 A.D.3d 1229 (Vega v. Bezio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vega v. Bezio, 105 A.D.3d 1229, 962 N.Y.S.2d 820 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was charged with violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting the use of a controlled substance after his urine twice tested positive for the presence of opiates. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty as charged. The determination was upheld upon administrative appeal, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, positive urinalysis test results and related documentation and the hearing testimony provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Neil v Fischer, 89 AD3d 1308, 1309 [2011], [1230]*1230lv denied 18 NY3d 807 [2012]). Contrary to petitioner’s arguments, that evidence amply established the chain of custody of the specimen and laid a foundation to permit consideration of the positive test results (see 7 NYCRR 1020.4, 1020.5; Matter of Neil v Fischer, 89 AD3d at 1309; Matter of Rowe v Goord, 289 AD2d 764, 765 [2001]). His remaining contentions have been considered and, to the extent they are properly before us, rejected.

Mercure, J.R, Rose, Stein and Garry, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was charged with violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting the use of a controlled substance after his urine twice tested positive for the presence of opiates. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty as charged. The determination was upheld upon administrative appeal, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, positive urinalysis test results and related documentation and the hearing testimony provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Neil v Fischer, 89 AD3d 1308, 1309 [2011], [1230]*1230lv denied 18 NY3d 807 [2012]). Contrary to petitioner’s arguments, that evidence amply established the chain of custody of the specimen and laid a foundation to permit consideration of the positive test results (see 7 NYCRR 1020.4, 1020.5; Matter of Neil v Fischer, 89 AD3d at 1309; Matter of Rowe v Goord, 289 AD2d 764, 765 [2001]). His remaining contentions have been considered and, to the extent they are properly before us, rejected.

Mercure, J.R, Rose, Stein and Garry, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

105 A.D.3d 1229, 962 N.Y.S.2d 820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vega-v-bezio-nyappdiv-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack