Vega-Sanchez v. Dept. of Revenue, Tc-Md 101072c (or.tax 3-10-2011)

Oregon Tax Court

Vega-Sanchez v. Dept. of Revenue, Tc-Md 101072c (or.tax 3-10-2011)

DecidedMarch 10, 2011

DocketTC-MD 101072C.

StatusPublished

This text of Vega-Sanchez v. Dept. of Revenue, Tc-Md 101072c (or.tax 3-10-2011) (Vega-Sanchez v. Dept. of Revenue, Tc-Md 101072c (or.tax 3-10-2011)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vega-Sanchez v. Dept. of Revenue, Tc-Md 101072c (or.tax 3-10-2011), (Or. Super. Ct. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

DECISION OF DISMISSAL This matter is before the court on its own motion to dismiss this case for lack of prosecution.

On December 3, 2010, the court sent the parties a Journal Entry instructing Plaintiff to sending information to Defendant by January 24, 2011. The Journal Entry advised that failure to comply with the deadlines set forth therein might result in dismissal of Plaintiff appeal.

Plaintiff's deadline has passed and Defendant has not received any of the information requested, nor any further communication from Plaintiff. As a consequence, the court finds this matter should be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Now, therefore,

IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that this matter is dismissed.

Dated this _____ day of March 2011. *Page 2 Your Complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the dateof the Decision or this Decision becomes final and cannot bechanged. This document was signed by Magistrate Dan Robinsonon March 10, 2011. The Court filed and entered this documenton March 10, 2011. *Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DECISION OF DISMISSAL This matter is before the court on its own motion to dismiss this case for lack of prosecution.

On December 3, 2010, the court sent the parties a Journal Entry instructing Plaintiff to sending information to Defendant by January 24, 2011. The Journal Entry advised that failure to comply with the deadlines set forth therein might result in dismissal of Plaintiff appeal.

Plaintiff's deadline has passed and Defendant has not received any of the information requested, nor any further communication from Plaintiff. As a consequence, the court finds this matter should be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Now, therefore,

IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that this matter is dismissed.

Dated this _____ day of March 2011. *Page 2 Your Complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the dateof the Decision or this Decision becomes final and cannot bechanged. This document was signed by Magistrate Dan Robinsonon March 10, 2011. The Court filed and entered this documenton March 10, 2011. *Page 1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Vega-Sanchez v. Dept. of Revenue, Tc-Md 101072c (or.tax 3-10-2011), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vega-sanchez-v-dept-of-revenue-tc-md-101072c-ortax-3-10-2011-ortc-2011.