Vega, Cecil Ray

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 10, 2007
DocketWR-66,460-01
StatusPublished

This text of Vega, Cecil Ray (Vega, Cecil Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vega, Cecil Ray, (Tex. 2007).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. WR-66,460-01
EX PARTE CECIL RAY VEGA, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 24025A-422 IN THE 422
ND DISTRICT COURT

FROM KAUFMAN COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance and sentenced to eight years' imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends, among other things, that his plea was involuntary because he was not properly admonished by the trial court. In addition, Applicant contends that trial counsel was ineffective for (1) not objecting to the trial court's failure to properly admonish Applicant; (2) not objecting to the State's use of both Tex. Health & Safety Code § 481.134(b) and § 481.134(c); and (3) advising Applicant that his sentence would be discharged within one year. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 608 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id.

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law in regard to Applicant's claim that he was not properly admonished. The trial court shall also determine whether trial counsel's performance was deficient and, if so, whether Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.



Filed: January 10, 2007

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Rodriguez
334 S.W.2d 294 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Ex Parte Lemke
13 S.W.3d 791 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2000)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Vega, Cecil Ray, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vega-cecil-ray-texcrimapp-2007.