Veg 83, LLC v. JTED83, Inc.

2019 NY Slip Op 1320
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 21, 2019
Docket158216/15 8472 8471
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 1320 (Veg 83, LLC v. JTED83, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Veg 83, LLC v. JTED83, Inc., 2019 NY Slip Op 1320 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Veg 83, LLC v JTED83, Inc. (2019 NY Slip Op 01320)
Veg 83, LLC v JTED83, Inc.
2019 NY Slip Op 01320
Decided on February 21, 2019
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 21, 2019
Friedman, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Gesmer, Kern, JJ.

158216/15 8472 8471

[*1]Veg 83, LLC, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v

JTED83, Inc., et al., Defendants-Appellants.


Berry Law PLLC, New York (Eric W. Berry of counsel), for appellants.

Ofeck & Heinze, LLP, Hackensack (Mark F. Heinze of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered September 29, 2016, in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $372,887.45, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Order, same court and Justice, entered October 4, 2017, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendants' motion to vacate the judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The IAS court properly granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint under CPLR 3213, and defendants failed to establish that the note was subject to a right of offset. While they raise possible defenses and counterclaims, these allegations create issues that are separate and severable from plaintiff's claims under the note and do not defeat plaintiff's motion for CPLR 3213 treatment (Mitsubishi Trust & Banking Corp. v Housing Servs. Assoc. , 227 AD2d 305, 306 [1st Dept 1996]).

We have considered defendants' remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: FEBRUARY 21, 2019

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mitsubishi Trust & Banking Corp. v. Housing Services Associates
227 A.D.2d 305 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 1320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/veg-83-llc-v-jted83-inc-nyappdiv-2019.