Veeder v. Moritz

New York Court of Chancery

Veeder v. Moritz

9 Paige Ch. 371, 1842 N.Y. LEXIS 599, 1842 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 29

DecidedJanuary 24, 1842

StatusPublished

This text of 9 Paige Ch. 371 (Veeder v. Moritz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Veeder v. Moritz, 9 Paige Ch. 371, 1842 N.Y. LEXIS 599, 1842 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 29 (N.Y. 1842).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chancellor.

The only question in this case is whether the complainant’s bill was properly verified so as to authorize the clerk to file it; the allegations therein not being sworn to positively, but merely upon the information and belief of the deponent. In ¡verifying a bill for the purpose of calling for an answer upon oath, as directed by the 17th rule of this court, or for the mere purpose of rendering a creditor’s bill regular under the rules which requires such bills to be verified by the oath of the complainant or of his agent or attorney, it is sufficient if the allegations are sworn to upon the information and belief of the complainant, or other person who verifies the bill.

Order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chancellor.

The only question in this case is whether the complainant’s bill was properly verified so as to authorize the clerk to file it; the allegations therein not being sworn to positively, but merely upon the information and belief of the deponent. In ¡verifying a bill for the purpose of calling for an answer upon oath, as directed by the 17th rule of this court, or for the mere purpose of rendering a creditor’s bill regular under the rules which requires such bills to be verified by the oath of the complainant or of his agent or attorney, it is sufficient if the allegations are sworn to upon the information and belief of the complainant, or other person who verifies the bill.

Order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 Paige Ch. 371, 1842 N.Y. LEXIS 599, 1842 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/veeder-v-moritz-nychanct-1842.