Vedutis v. South Plainfield Board of Education
362 A.2d 51, 142 N.J. Super. 492, 1976 N.J. Super. LEXIS 819
Opinion
The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Demos, which was approved in Rost v. Fair Lawn Bd. of Ed., 137 N. J. Super. 76 (App. Div. 1975).
In view of our disposition of the matter, we need not consider the issue of informal or substantial compliance which was also raised on this appeal.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vedutis v. South Plainfield Board of Education, 362 A.2d 51, 142 N.J. Super. 492, 1976 N.J. Super. LEXIS 819 (N.J. Ct. App. 1976).
362 A.2d 51 (Vedutis v. South Plainfield Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
ESTATE OF MICAH SAMUEL TENNANT DUNMORE v. PLEASANTVILLE BOARD OF EDUCATION ANGELA TENNANT v. PLEASANTVILLE BOARD OF EDUCATION (L-0889-20 and L-0901-20, ATLANTIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2022
SP v. Collier High School
725 A.2d 1142 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1999)
Vedutis v. SO. PLAINFIELD BD. OF ED.
362 A.2d 51 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)