Vectren Infrastructure Services Corp v. Department of Treasury

Michigan Supreme Court

Vectren Infrastructure Services Corp v. Department of Treasury

DecidedNovember 25, 2020

Docket161422

StatusPublished

This text of Vectren Infrastructure Services Corp v. Department of Treasury (Vectren Infrastructure Services Corp v. Department of Treasury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vectren Infrastructure Services Corp v. Department of Treasury, (Mich. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

November 25, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem 161422 Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Richard H. Bernstein VECTREN INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES Elizabeth T. Clement CORP., successor-in-interest to MINNESOTA Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices LIMITED, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v SC: 161422 COA: 345462 Ct of Claims: 17-000107-MT DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 12, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the Court of Appeals judgment and we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals to address the plaintiff’s arguments regarding the proper method for calculating the business tax due under the statutory formula. See MCL 208.1201; MCL 208.1301(2). This foundational issue must be addressed before determining that MCL 208.1309 requires application of an alternative method of apportionment.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. November 25, 2020 s1124 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

November 25, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem 161422 Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Richard H. Bernstein VECTREN INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES Elizabeth T. Clement CORP., successor-in-interest to MINNESOTA Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices LIMITED, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v SC: 161422 COA: 345462 Ct of Claims: 17-000107-MT DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 12, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the Court of Appeals judgment and we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals to address the plaintiff’s arguments regarding the proper method for calculating the business tax due under the statutory formula. See MCL 208.1201; MCL 208.1301(2). This foundational issue must be addressed before determining that MCL 208.1309 requires application of an alternative method of apportionment.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. November 25, 2020 s1124 Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Vectren Infrastructure Services Corp v. Department of Treasury, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vectren-infrastructure-services-corp-v-department-of-treasury-mich-2020.