Vecsey v. Vecsey
This text of 100 So. 2d 437 (Vecsey v. Vecsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an interlocutory appeal from an order allowing alimony, counsel fees and suit money pendente lite. When the statutory basis for such an order is established, an appellate court will not substitute its judgment for that of the Chancellor unless a clear abuse of discretion is made to appear. Floyd v. Floyd, 91 Fla. 910, 108 So. 896; McAllister v. McAllister, 140 Fla. 207, 191 So. 303.
The briefs and appendices failing to establish an abuse of discretion on the part of the Chancellor, the order is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
100 So. 2d 437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vecsey-v-vecsey-fladistctapp-1958.