Veasy v. City of Phenix City

Alabama Court of Appeals

Veasy v. City of Phenix City

129 So. 927, 24 Ala. App. 692

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided August 19, 1930·No. 4 Div. 626.·Published

Opinion

RICE; J.

The court has read the entire evidence in this, case, sitting en banc.

The case, as made by the evidence, against the appellant, cannot be distinguished, in principle, from that shown by the evidence in the case of Trammel v. City of Roanoke, 23 Ala. App. 385, 123 So. 793, and, upon the authority of what we said in the opinion in' that case, we *693 hold that it was error to refuse to give, at appellant’s request, the general affirmative charge in his favor.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE; J.

The court has read the entire evidence in this, case, sitting en banc.

The case, as made by the evidence, against the appellant, cannot be distinguished, in principle, from that shown by the evidence in the case of Trammel v. City of Roanoke, 23 Ala. App. 385, 123 So. 793, and, upon the authority of what we said in the opinion in' that case, we *693 hold that it was error to refuse to give, at appellant’s request, the general affirmative charge in his favor.

Reversed and remanded.

Veasy v. City of Phenix City, 129 So. 927, 24 Ala. App. 692 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

129 So. 927 (Veasy v. City of Phenix City) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related