Veasley v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Veasley v. State

89 So. 927, 18 Ala. App. 698

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 17, 1921

Docket5 Div. 338.

StatusPublished

This text of 89 So. 927 (Veasley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Veasley v. State, 89 So. 927, 18 Ala. App. 698 (Ala. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The defendant was indicted for manslaughter in the first degree, was convicted as charged, and the jury fixed his punnishment at five years in the penitentiary. Judgment and sentence rendered accordingly. This appeal is upon the record proper, without bill of exceptions. Upon examination of the record it is ascertained that all the proceedings were regular and no error appears. The judgment rendered in the lower court is therefore affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

The defendant was indicted for manslaughter in the first degree, was convicted as charged, and the jury fixed his punnishment at five years in the penitentiary. Judgment and sentence rendered accordingly. This appeal is upon the record proper, without bill of exceptions. Upon examination of the record it is ascertained that all the proceedings were regular and no error appears. The judgment rendered in the lower court is therefore affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 So. 927, 18 Ala. App. 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/veasley-v-state-alactapp-1921.