Veasey v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Veasey v. State

64 S.E. 709, 6 Ga. App. 208, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 242

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 18, 1909

Docket1757

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 64 S.E. 709 (Veasey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Veasey v. State, 64 S.E. 709, 6 Ga. App. 208, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 242 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. Th.e remarks of the solicitor were entirely legitimate, under the evidence, and, even if objectionable, would not be a ground for a new trial, unless they were objected to at the time and some appropriate action of .the court then invoked. Civil Code, §4419; Odell v. State, 120 Ga. 152 (47 S. E. 577); Southern Ry. Co. v. Wright, ante, 172 (64 S. E. 703).

2. No error of law appears, and there is some evidence, although weak and unsatisfactory, to support the verdict, which was approved by the trial judge. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, C. J.

1. Th.e remarks of the solicitor were entirely legitimate, under the evidence, and, even if objectionable, would not be a ground for a new trial, unless they were objected to at the time and some appropriate action of .the court then invoked. Civil Code, §4419; Odell v. State, 120 Ga. 152 (47 S. E. 577); Southern Ry. Co. v. Wright, ante, 172 (64 S. E. 703).

2. No error of law appears, and there is some evidence, although weak and unsatisfactory, to support the verdict, which was approved by the trial judge. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 S.E. 709, 6 Ga. App. 208, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/veasey-v-state-gactapp-1909.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack