Veasey v. Abbott

Supreme Court

Veasey v. Abbott

136 S. Ct. 1823, 194 L. Ed. 2d 828, 84 U.S.L.W. 3611, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 2927, 2016 WL 1707589

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedApril 29, 2016

DocketNo. 15A999.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 136 S. Ct. 1823 (Veasey v. Abbott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Veasey v. Abbott, 136 S. Ct. 1823, 194 L. Ed. 2d 828, 84 U.S.L.W. 3611, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 2927, 2016 WL 1707589 (U.S. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Application to vacate the stay entered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on October 14, 2014, presented to Justice THOMAS and by him referred to the Court is denied. The Court recognizes the time constraints the parties confront in light of the scheduled elections in November, 2016. If, on or before July 20, 2016, the Court of Appeals has neither issued an opinion on the merits of the case nor issued an order vacating or modifying the current stay order, an aggrieved party may seek interim relief from this Court by filing an appropriate application. An aggrieved party may also seek interim relief if any change in circumstances before that date supports further arguments respecting the stay order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application to vacate the stay entered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on October 14, 2014, presented to Justice THOMAS and by him referred to the Court is denied. The Court recognizes the time constraints the parties confront in light of the scheduled elections in November, 2016. If, on or before July 20, 2016, the Court of Appeals has neither issued an opinion on the merits of the case nor issued an order vacating or modifying the current stay order, an aggrieved party may seek interim relief from this Court by filing an appropriate application. An aggrieved party may also seek interim relief if any change in circumstances before that date supports further arguments respecting the stay order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 S. Ct. 1823, 194 L. Ed. 2d 828, 84 U.S.L.W. 3611, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 2927, 2016 WL 1707589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/veasey-v-abbott-scotus-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack