Veale v. Hasbrook
This text of Veale v. Hasbrook (Veale v. Hasbrook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 99-2348
DAVID T. VEALE,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM HASBROOK, MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF SELECTMEN FOR THE TOWN OF GILSUM, NH; JOAN MILLER, MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF SELECTMEN FOR THE TOWN OF GILSUM, NH; THE TOWN OF GILSUM, NH,
Defendants, Appellees,
KENNETH DOOLEY, MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF SELECTMEN FOR THE TOWN OF GILSUM, NH,
Defendant.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
[Hon. Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr., U.S. District Judge]
Before
Selya, Circuit Judge, Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge, and Boudin, Circuit Judge.
David T. Veale on brief pro se. John T. Alexander and Ransmeier & Spellman on brief for appellees. SEPTEMBER 28, 2000
Per Curiam. Appellant David T. Veale appeals from
the district court's grant of summary judgment to appellees,
the Town of Gilsum, New Hampshire, and certain members of
its Board of Selectmen. After carefully reviewing the
parties' briefs and the record, we affirm the judgment of
the district court essentially for the reasons stated in its
Order, dated September 17, 1999. We add that the district
court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's
motion for a change of venue.
Affirmed. See Local Rule 27(c).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Veale v. Hasbrook, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/veale-v-hasbrook-ca1-2000.