Veal v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Veal v. State

105 So. 705, 21 Ala. App. 48

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 26, 1925

Docket4 Div. 23.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 105 So. 705 (Veal v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Veal v. State, 105 So. 705, 21 Ala. App. 48 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

The defendant was convicted of distilling, etc., and appeals. This case has been here once before. Veal v. State, 19 Ala. App. 168, 95 So. 783.

Charge 4, refused to defendant, was, under the reasoning and rule laid down in Tatum v. State, 20 Ala. App. 24, 100 So. 569, the case he cites, misleading, and properly refused.

It appears that the defendant has had a fair trial, and we can find no prejudicial error in the record.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI