Veal v. Paulk

159 S.E.2d 304, 117 Ga. App. 109, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 993
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 18, 1968
Docket43349
StatusPublished

This text of 159 S.E.2d 304 (Veal v. Paulk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Veal v. Paulk, 159 S.E.2d 304, 117 Ga. App. 109, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 993 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Pannell, Judge.

This is an appeal “from all of the rulings of August 31, 1967 ... by the trial judge.” None of the rulings appealed from is such as will support an appeal under Section 1 of the Appellate Practice Act of 1965 (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18); and since the Act of 1967 (Ga. L. 1967, p. 220), amendatory of the Appellate Practice Act of 1965, Section 1 of which provided for appeal from other judgments not otherwise subject to appeal when the trial judge certifies the importance of immediate review, has been held unconstitutional because of the absence of an enacting clause (Joiner v. State, 223 Ga. 367 (155 SE2d 8)), the present appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Jordan, P. J., and Deen, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Joiner v. State
155 S.E.2d 8 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 S.E.2d 304, 117 Ga. App. 109, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 993, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/veal-v-paulk-gactapp-1968.