Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Veal v. Huffman

Veal v. Huffman

130 S.E. 704, 34 Ga. App. 675, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 479
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 15, 1925
Docket16821
StatusPublished

This text of 130 S.E. 704 (Veal v. Huffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Veal v. Huffman, 130 S.E. 704, 34 Ga. App. 675, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 479 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Blood worth, J.

1. The court did not err in any of its rulings on the pleadings on which error was assigned in the exceptions pendente lite.

2. In no ground of the motion for a new trial is there any error that requires another hearing of the case.

[676]*676Decided December 15, 1925. Paul H. Boyal, for plaintiff in error. F. W. Copeland, Porter & Mebane, contra.

3. The verdict is not lacking in evidence to support it.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., conew.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 S.E. 704, 34 Ga. App. 675, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/veal-v-huffman-gactapp-1925.