Veach v. Bailiff

Superior Court of Delaware

Veach v. Bailiff

5 Del. 379

Superior Court of Delaware·Decided July 1, 1852·Published

Opinion

The Court

over-ruling the objections on the two other grounds, ruled out the deposition, because it was taken after the commission [380]*380was returnable, and of course after the authority of the commissioner ceased.

Rodney, for plaintiff. Guthrie, for defendant.

They suggested that perhaps this might be cured by a special continuance of the commission from term to term, or by a commission without special day of return.

Nonsuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court

over-ruling the objections on the two other grounds, ruled out the deposition, because it was taken after the commission [380]*380was returnable, and of course after the authority of the commissioner ceased.

Rodney, for plaintiff. Guthrie, for defendant.

They suggested that perhaps this might be cured by a special continuance of the commission from term to term, or by a commission without special day of return.

Nonsuit.

Veach v. Bailiff, 5 Del. 379 (Del. Ct. App. 1852).

Pincite

5 Del. 379 (Veach v. Bailiff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.