Veach v. Bailiff

Superior Court of Delaware

Veach v. Bailiff

5 Del. 379

DecidedJuly 1, 1852

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Del. 379 (Veach v. Bailiff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Veach v. Bailiff, 5 Del. 379 (Del. Ct. App. 1852).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court

over-ruling the objections on the two other grounds, ruled out the deposition, because it was taken after the commission [380]*380was returnable, and of course after the authority of the commissioner ceased.

Rodney, for plaintiff. Guthrie, for defendant.

They suggested that perhaps this might be cured by a special continuance of the commission from term to term, or by a commission without special day of return.

Nonsuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court

over-ruling the objections on the two other grounds, ruled out the deposition, because it was taken after the commission [380]*380was returnable, and of course after the authority of the commissioner ceased.

Rodney, for plaintiff. Guthrie, for defendant.

They suggested that perhaps this might be cured by a special continuance of the commission from term to term, or by a commission without special day of return.

Nonsuit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Del. 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/veach-v-bailiff-delsuperct-1852.